“The Effect of Positive Psychological Factors on Organizational Ambidexterity for Faculty Members and the Assistant Body of Higher Education Institutions
This research aims to identify the effect of positive psychological factors (such as self-efficacy, optimism, hope, and flexibility) on organizational ambidixterety (i.e. exploitation and exploration) of faculty members and the assistant body at the AAST, type of this effect, determining the most positive psychological factors on organizational ambidixterety. It also aims to identify how to improve organizational ambidixterety level among faculty members and the assistant body in the AAST by tackling these factors. The researcher used the descriptive survey method, which depen-ds on the study of reality or phenomenon as it is in reality and caring for it’s accurate description. The researcher used the questionnaire as the main data collection tool. The final sample was (302) items.
Shehata, Y. E. S. A. M. (2018). “The Effect of Positive Psychological Factors on Organizational Ambidexterity for Faculty Members and the Assistant Body of Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Alexandria University for Administrative Sciences, 55(2), 207-254. doi: 10.21608/acj.2018.36279
MLA
Yasser El Sayed Ali Mohamed Shehata. "“The Effect of Positive Psychological Factors on Organizational Ambidexterity for Faculty Members and the Assistant Body of Higher Education Institutions", Journal of Alexandria University for Administrative Sciences, 55, 2, 2018, 207-254. doi: 10.21608/acj.2018.36279
HARVARD
Shehata, Y. E. S. A. M. (2018). '“The Effect of Positive Psychological Factors on Organizational Ambidexterity for Faculty Members and the Assistant Body of Higher Education Institutions', Journal of Alexandria University for Administrative Sciences, 55(2), pp. 207-254. doi: 10.21608/acj.2018.36279
VANCOUVER
Shehata, Y. E. S. A. M. “The Effect of Positive Psychological Factors on Organizational Ambidexterity for Faculty Members and the Assistant Body of Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Alexandria University for Administrative Sciences, 2018; 55(2): 207-254. doi: 10.21608/acj.2018.36279