The peer review process at the Journal of Alexandria University for Administrative Sciences is designed to ensure the quality, integrity, and originality of published research. Here’s an overview of the steps involved:
- Submission: Authors submit their manuscripts through our online submission system.
- Initial Screening: The editorial team conducts an initial review to assess the manuscript’s relevance, adherence to submission guidelines, and overall quality.
- Assignment of Reviewers: If the manuscript passes the initial screening, it is assigned to two or more independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant field.
- Review Evaluation: Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on criteria such as originality, methodology, significance, and clarity. They provide constructive feedback and recommendations for improvement.
- Editorial Decision: The editorial team considers the reviewers' comments and makes a decision regarding the manuscript. Possible outcomes include acceptance, minor or major revisions, or rejection.
- Revisions: If revisions are requested, authors submit a revised version along with a response to the reviewers’ comments. The manuscript may undergo further review.
- Final Decision: After revisions, the editorial team makes a final decision on publication.
- Publication: Accepted manuscripts are scheduled for publication in the next available issue of the journal after authors’ submission of a final plagiarism check.
This rigorous peer review process ensures that the Journal maintains high standards of scholarly excellence and contributes valuable insights to the field of administrative sciences.
Average time from submission to publication is three months
